Work, Wages, and Well-Being

Understanding North Carolina’s Labor Market

No matter what we look like or where we come from, we all deserve:

  • Fulfilling work
  • A living wage
  • The freedom to thrive

To know whether our economy and political systems are delivering on this vision, and to understand where we’re falling short, we need to look at labor market data.

Too often, economists, politicians, and financial commentators focus only on topline figures like headline unemployment rates. A full picture that does justice to the nuances, complexities, and chronic issues that we face requires a much more detailed analysis. This analysis reveals:

  • Underemployment and unemployment
  • Fewer jobs relative to the working age population
  • Real wages failing to keep up with productivity growth
  • Households struggling to make ends meet
  • Pernicious and persistent racial, ethnic, and gender wage gaps
  • Precarity for disaster survivors and federal government employees

The takeaway: North Carolina’s economy isn’t working for everyday people like you and me.

Only by digging deeper with a fuller analysis can we begin to craft and implement policies that can realize our vision of an economy that leads to well-being for all.

Please feel free to download images of these graphics for use in your work, as long as you cite the NC Budget & Tax Center and link back to this page. There are buttons beneath each chart to download the image or embed the interactive chart. If you would like more information about any data on this page, please contact us at [email protected].

Spotlight

Hurricane Helene’s toll on Western NC’s economy

On Sept. 27, 2024, Hurricane Helene devastated Western North Carolina, causing catastrophic flooding, significant property and infrastructure damage, and a tragic loss of life. Businesses in the region have struggled to stabilize as they’ve faced a shortage of consumer demand, and more than half have laid off workers or cut hours. The map above depicts the yearly percentage change in people unemployed and looking for work across disaster-affected counties. It illustrates that in those counties hit hardest by Helene, workers are still struggling to recover.


The second Trump administration has slashed key federal jobs nationwide

Federal employees provide crucial public goods and services that our communities rely on every day, from ensuring food and medicine are safe to providing warnings about national disasters. Since the inauguration in January 2025, the Trump administration has slashed federal employment through a variety of tactics:

The table below shows how the federal workforce has shrunk since Trump’s inauguration — but it understates the full impact of these actions because employees who have been forced to take leave or are receiving ongoing severance pay may still be counted as employed. Some estimates put cuts to the federal workforce closer to 150,000 employees.

Return to Top

Job Market

Headline unemployment: Low rates don’t show the whole picture

The most widely used labor market indicator by economists, financial analysts, and politicians is the headline unemployment rate. This counts all unemployed workers who have actively looked for a job in the past two weeks as a share of everyone in the labor force. A headline unemployment rate below 5 percent is generally taken to indicate a strong labor market. Typically, when the headline unemployment rate goes above 5 percent, it spikes up dramatically indicating a major economic event, as depicted in the chart below during the dot com bubble, the 2008 financial crisis, and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

While headline unemployment is the most common way to look at the labor market, there are serious limitations in considering only headline unemployment. The headline unemployment rate does not account for people who are unemployed and want a job but have stopped searching because they’re discouraged, people who want to be working more hours, or workers who are working multiple jobs because they can’t find a single job that pays enough to make ends meet. For these reasons, the headline unemployment rate generally overstates the ability of workers to find a job. Other more comprehensive unemployment measures are available, but they are updated much less frequently and are not readily available at the state level.[1]


Share of total population working: Decline over time shows fewer jobs are available relative to the working age population

Another way to look at the job market is to look at the percentage of the total working-age population[2] with jobs. Economists call this the employment-population-ratio. This measure is helpful to look at in addition to the unemployment rate because it doesn’t exclude “discouraged” workers — meaning people who aren’t employed but have stopped actively looking for work.  It does have some limitations: like headline unemployment, this indicator doesn’t account for underemployment, meaning people who have a part-time job but want a full-time job. On its own the ratio also doesn’t show whether changes are driven by economic factors, like a recession, or demographic factors, like an aging population. But the long-term trend of this percentage gives an indication of the overall health of the economy. As this percentage declines over time, that means that there are fewer jobs available relative to the size of the working age population.


Monthly and yearly changes: Comparing jobs figures to the past month and year shows short-term economic trends

A good way to get a sense of shorter-term trends in the job market is to look at the percentage change in key figures. Large monthly and yearly percentage changes in double digits can indicate significant economic events. For instance, a large positive monthly percentage change in headline unemployment often indicates that a recession has begun or is in effect.


County and metropolitan jobs data: Local data gives a more complete picture of the economy statewide

We can also look at changes in employment at the local level. This is important because national and state-level aggregates can mask dramatic differences on the ground. This can be due to significant events that only affect certain regions, like climate disasters, or to regional differences in where industries are located. For instance, economic development policies that incentivize manufacturing investment in rural areas might cause substantial job growth in rural communities, while leaving urban centers mostly unaffected. These sorts of localized differences matter for sound policy choices, such as responding to economic crises and developing effective workforce development programs to ensure communities have access to quality jobs.

The table below displays the change in employment since last year in major metropolitan areas in NC. It gives a sense of the areas that are experiencing job growth and job loss.

The map below shows the headline unemployment rate by county. It gives an indication of where people who are unemployed and actively searching for work are having the most difficult time finding a job. But remember, the headline unemployment rate doesn’t include “discouraged” workers — meaning people who aren’t employed but have stopped actively looking for work.

The table below displays the changes in various employment figures over the past year at the county level. Unlike the prior table that focuses exclusively on metropolitan areas, this table includes all 100 counties in North Carolina, rural and urban alike.

Return to Top

[1] The most comprehensive unemployment measure (called the U-6 unemployment rate) looks at all unemployed and underemployed workers, including people who are looking for work and have actively searched anytime during the past year, as well as people who are working part time but want to be working full time. The U-6 unemployment rate is generally 3 to 8 percent higher than headline unemployment. For example, as of June 1, 2025, the national headline unemployment rate is 4.1%, while the U-6 unemployment rate is 7.7%. That means that as of June 1, 2025, over 13 million people in the US are unemployed or underemployed.

[2] The total population includes noninstitutionalized civilians ages 16 and over. It excludes active duty members of the military, people who are incarcerated, and people living in skilled-nursing facilities or other hospital group quarters. See https://www.bls.gov/cps/definitions.htm#population.

Wages and Income

Besides (un)employment figures, the other component of the labor market is wages — how much workers are paid at their jobs and how much this allows them to purchase to live and sustain themselves.

Average weekly wages: Below a Living Income Standard in most counties

The map below shows the average weekly wage in each county in NC, and it compares the average weekly wage of each county with the weekly wage required to make ends meet in that county. These county-by-county living weekly wage estimates come from BTC's Living Income Standard. An explanation of our full methodology for generating these living wage estimates is available here.

Each county on the map below is shaded by how the average weekly wage compares with the living weekly wage in that county. The redder that a county is, the larger the gap between the average weekly wage and the wage required to make ends meet. The overall redness of the map is an indication that North Carolinians across the state are struggling to meet their basic needs because employers are not on average paying a living wage.


Worker pay and productivity: Growing gap shows business owners taking a greater and greater share of the pie

While the map above focuses on average weekly wages based on the most recent data available, it’s also helpful to look at how wages have changed over time. With national data, we can compare increases in workers’ pay to increases in worker productivity over time. Rising real wages (meaning adjusted for inflation) mean that workers are gaining purchasing power and can pay for more goods and services to meet their needs and sustain themselves.

Productivity is a measure of how much total revenue a worker generates in the economy for each hour they work. Analysis from the Economic Policy Institute makes these two measures comparable by creating an index. (You can learn more about their calculations here.)

The chart below shows that real hourly wages have only modestly increased since 1948, while net productivity has grown much more steeply — and this gap is growing. The fact that real wages are not growing at the same rate as productivity implies that business owners are retaining a greater and greater share of the total output that workers produce.


Wages by race: Data shows persistent racial inequities

By disaggregating the data on real wages by race and ethnicity, we can see how wage gains in NC are distributed across racial and ethnic divides. The chart below reveals that real wages continue to be higher for individuals who are white than those who are Black or Latine,[3]  a result of inequities and barriers created by policy choices and a history of systemic racism, bias, and discrimination. Moreover, since the first quarter of 2020, the racial and ethnic wage gap has gotten larger.


Wages by gender: Data shows persistent gender inequities

Similarly, we can disaggregate data on real wages in NC by gender. When we do, we see that men, on average, are paid more than women, and this gender wage gap has remained steady throughout the 21st Century.

Return to Top

[3] The Economic Policy Institute reports data for Hispanic workers, which includes people who identify as Hispanic or Latino. BTC uses the gender neutral-term Latine.